{
  "_meta": {
    "version": "0.1-combined",
    "status": "hypothesis — two approaches held in tension, designed to be deformed by the inference store",
    "dichotomy": "structure/function — orthogonal to the founding analog/digital tension",
    "description": "Two alternate approaches to the logos coordinate system held in the same file. Functional (event-level: what communication does) and structural (context-level: where communication occurs in social space). A model reading this should react to both simultaneously. The _relationship block names what is known and unknown about how they compose.",
    "component": "logos — combined structural and functional schema",
    "sources": [
      "Speech Act Theory — Austin, Searle (functional)",
      "Cooperative Principle — Grice (functional)",
      "Grid/Group framework — Douglas (functional)",
      "Dunbar — group size thresholds, empirical (structural)",
      "Tönnies — gemeinschaft/gesellschaft (structural)",
      "Machin — affective field, placeholder (structural)",
      "Ostrom — governance/reciprocity (structural)",
      "Benedict — cultural layer, thin sourcing (structural)",
      "Logos Core Tree — synthesized in project (both)",
      "logos_schema_v01.json — functional source",
      "input_ideas/perplexity_suggested_v02.json — structural source"
    ],
    "llm": "claude-sonnet-4-6 | 2026-05-20 | pillars/logos/logos_combined_v01.json | created — functional (logos_schema_v01) and structural (perplexity_suggested_v02) held in tension; _relationship block names overlap candidates and open questions"
  },

  "functional": {
    "_level": "event — what communication does",
    "_schema_ref": "logos_schema_v01.json",
    "description": "Sparse coordinate system for individual communication acts at the local scale. Utterances do things — this schema describes what they do, how they are received, and whether cooperative maxims are honored.",
    "dimensions": {
      "act_type": {
        "description": "What kind of action the communication performs.",
        "values": {
          "assertive":   "claims something is true",
          "directive":   "attempts to get someone to do something",
          "commissive":  "commits the speaker to future action",
          "expressive":  "expresses psychological state",
          "declaration": "changes reality by being said"
        }
      },
      "transmission": {
        "description": "How the communication moves through the social field.",
        "values": {
          "broadcast": "one-to-many, public, low fidelity to source",
          "leak":      "restricted, few recipients, high emotional charge, unofficial",
          "archive":   "past-to-future, preserved, institutional, resistant to revision"
        }
      },
      "resonance": {
        "description": "The emotional field the communication carries or creates.",
        "values": {
          "harmony":  "synchronization, shared understanding, empathic alignment",
          "friction": "disconnection, dissonance, unempathic states",
          "illusion": "apparent harmony masking underlying friction"
        }
      },
      "authority": {
        "description": "What power structure the communication draws on to be heard.",
        "values": {
          "sovereign": "top-down, institutional, formal, legal",
          "tribal":    "horizontal, peer, normative, cultural",
          "occult":    "hidden, known only within a restricted group"
        }
      },
      "utility": {
        "description": "What the communication is functionally for — its payload.",
        "values": {
          "instruction": "actionable, enabling",
          "narrative":   "meaning-making, contextualizing, mythologizing",
          "currency":    "value-tracking, social capital, ledger of obligation"
        }
      },
      "cooperative": {
        "description": "Whether Grice's cooperative maxims are honored or violated. Violations generate implicature — meaning beyond the words. The gap between said and meant is a tension signal.",
        "maxims": {
          "quantity": "say enough, not too much",
          "quality":  "say what you believe to be true",
          "relation": "say what is relevant",
          "manner":   "be clear and orderly"
        },
        "status": ["honored", "violated", "suspended"]
      },
      "social_field": {
        "description": "Douglas grid/group axes describing the social constraint field.",
        "grid":  "0.0-1.0: degree to which behavior is constrained by explicit rules",
        "group": "0.0-1.0: degree to which individual identity is defined by group membership"
      }
    }
  },

  "structural": {
    "_level": "context — where communication occurs in social space",
    "_schema_ref": "input_ideas/perplexity_suggested_v02.json",
    "description": "Geometric coordinate system for locating communication contexts in social space. Layers are coordinate points, not social labels. Axes are ordered from self to global scale.",
    "axes": {
      "scale":          ["self", "dyad", "small_group", "local_network", "institution", "global"],
      "density":        ["embodied", "proximal", "shared", "distributed", "bureaucratic", "archival"],
      "persistence":    ["momentary", "short_term", "routine", "customary", "institutional", "durable"],
      "authority":      ["self", "pair", "group", "elders", "system", "formal"],
      "transmission":   ["direct", "leak", "ritual", "broadcast", "archive", "code"],
      "memory_channel": ["episodic", "shared", "semantic", "procedural", "institutional", "global"],
      "language_mode":  ["indexical", "relational", "normative", "symbolic", "contractual", "formalized"]
    },
    "layers": [
      {
        "id": "self",
        "coords": { "scale": "self", "density": "embodied", "persistence": "momentary", "authority": "self", "transmission": "direct", "memory_channel": "episodic", "language_mode": "indexical" },
        "_src": ["searle", "grice"]
      },
      {
        "id": "dyad",
        "coords": { "scale": "dyad", "density": "proximal", "persistence": "short_term", "authority": "pair", "transmission": "direct", "memory_channel": "shared", "language_mode": "relational" },
        "_src": ["grice", "searle"]
      },
      {
        "id": "small_group",
        "coords": { "scale": "small_group", "density": "shared", "persistence": "routine", "authority": "group", "transmission": "leak", "memory_channel": "shared", "language_mode": "normative" },
        "_src": ["dunbar", "machin"]
      },
      {
        "id": "local_network",
        "coords": { "scale": "local_network", "density": "distributed", "persistence": "customary", "authority": "elders", "transmission": "ritual", "memory_channel": "semantic", "language_mode": "symbolic" },
        "_src": ["dunbar", "ostrom", "tonnies"]
      },
      {
        "id": "institution",
        "coords": { "scale": "institution", "density": "bureaucratic", "persistence": "institutional", "authority": "system", "transmission": "broadcast", "memory_channel": "institutional", "language_mode": "contractual" },
        "_src": ["ostrom", "tonnies"]
      },
      {
        "id": "global",
        "coords": { "scale": "global", "density": "archival", "persistence": "durable", "authority": "formal", "transmission": "code", "memory_channel": "global", "language_mode": "formalized" },
        "_src": ["benedict", "douglas"]
      }
    ],
    "cross_cutting": {
      "family": {
        "kind": "overlay",
        "spans": ["self", "dyad", "small_group"],
        "features": ["kin_relation", "reciprocity", "shared_memory"],
        "_src": ["dunbar", "machin"]
      },
      "culture": {
        "kind": "overlay",
        "spans": ["local_network", "institution", "global"],
        "features": ["symbolic_stability", "norm_reproduction", "archive_support"],
        "_src": ["benedict", "tonnies"]
      },
      "religion": {
        "kind": "overlay",
        "spans": ["small_group", "local_network", "institution", "global"],
        "features": ["shared_cosmology", "ritual_transmission", "nonlocal_authority"],
        "_src": ["douglas", "tonnies"]
      },
      "society": {
        "kind": "aggregate",
        "spans": ["local_network", "institution", "global"],
        "features": ["role_systems", "rule_systems", "mass_transmission"],
        "_src": ["ostrom", "tonnies", "dunbar"]
      }
    },
    "constraints": {
      "orthogonality": [
        "scale is independent of memory_channel",
        "authority is independent of transmission",
        "language_mode is independent of density"
      ],
      "monotonicity": [
        "persistence generally increases with scale",
        "archival transmission appears only at high scale",
        "formal authority emerges at upper layers"
      ]
    }
  },

  "_relationship": {
    "status": "open — inference store decides",
    "known": [
      "functional describes event-level communication: what an utterance does",
      "structural describes context-level social space: where communication occurs",
      "these are not competing — they operate at different levels of analysis",
      "both are needed for a complete logos coordinate",
      "the structure/function dichotomy is orthogonal to the founding analog/digital tension — the product is a 2x2 space"
    ],
    "unknown": [
      "how functional and structural compose into a single inference tag",
      "whether the analog/digital axis cross-cuts both or maps differently onto each",
      "whether tension score needs two independent axes (analog/digital AND structure/function)",
      "which structural layer a given functional act_type is most likely to occur at",
      "whether resonance (functional) and density (structural) are independent or correlated"
    ],
    "overlap_candidates": [
      "authority: functional has 3 values (sovereign/tribal/occult), structural has 6-value scale (self→formal) — same axis at different resolutions?",
      "transmission: functional has 3 values (broadcast/leak/archive), structural has 6 values (direct/leak/ritual/broadcast/archive/code) — 'leak' and 'broadcast' and 'archive' appear in both — structural may be a higher-resolution version of functional"
    ],
    "generative_questions": [
      "Does a 'declaration' act_type (functional) only occur at 'institution' or 'global' structural layers?",
      "Does 'illusion' resonance (functional) correlate with 'institutional' or 'durable' persistence (structural)?",
      "Is the cooperative 'violated' status more likely at high structural scale (institution, global)?",
      "Do the structural monotonicity constraints predict anything about functional resonance trajectories?"
    ]
  },

  "inference_tag": {
    "description": "An inference may be tagged against functional dimensions, structural coordinates, or both. Partial tagging is valid — a model should tag what it can and leave the rest null.",
    "template": {
      "logos_combined_v01": {
        "functional": {
          "act_type":    null,
          "transmission": null,
          "resonance":   null,
          "authority":   null,
          "utility":     null,
          "cooperative": {
            "maxim_violated": null,
            "status":         null
          },
          "social_field": {
            "grid":  null,
            "group": null
          }
        },
        "structural": {
          "scale":          null,
          "density":        null,
          "persistence":    null,
          "authority":      null,
          "transmission":   null,
          "memory_channel": null,
          "language_mode":  null
        }
      }
    }
  }
}
